Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam

Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam
Developer: AlphaDream
Publisher: Nintendo
Original System: 3DS
System Played On: 3DS
Rating: 4 stars

On November 15, 2023, I defeated Bowser and Paper Bowser, thus finishing Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam on the Nintendo 3DS! During my playthrough, I leveled up Mario & Luigi & Paper Mario to level 38, and I rescued all the Paper Toads, and I did it all in 35 1/4 gameplay hours over a span of 2 1/2 months.

To quote the Simpsons & Family Guy crossover: "Yay! A crossover always brings out the best in each show! It certainly doesn't smack of desperation, the priorities are always creative, and not driven by marketing..." This sarcasm accurately portrays how crossovers seem like a good idea, but too often they rely on the marketing of the crossover itself than actual good writing. I am glad to report that Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam does not fall under this category. Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam truly wants to explore the idea of what would happen if the characters of Mushroom Kingdom would meet their paper equivalent. The writing was on point. More on that later.

The most notable thing that a Mario & Luigi and Paper Mario crossover brings to the table is a third member to the party - Paper Mario. Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Insider Story had Bowser as a third playable character, but Bowser play was asynchronous with Mario & Luigi play. Mario & Luigi: Dream had a team of Luigis playing with Mario in Dream World, but it was more like the Luigis were powering up Mario than actual playing alongside him. The last game to really have more than 2 playable characters was Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time, which included Baby Mario & Baby Luigi. With 2 games between Partners in Time and Paper Jam, more party members felt fresh. Paper Mario wasn't just another member of the party, though. He had some unique properties. He can make up to 6 copies of himself, which get destroyed before Paper Mario loses health. Naturally, to balance things out, Paper Mario has less HP. Of course, feeding Paper Mario enough heart beans can get Paper Mario caught up. Just in case gamers struggle with Paper Mario having fewer hit points, Paper Mario has flutter jump to dodge enemy attacks. Naturally, the developers accounted for this, but it's still an advantage, nonetheless. Paper Mario copies also come in handy for the attack. Instead of the usual double jump Mario & Luigi can do with a timed jump attack, Paper Mario can do a jump for each copy, up to 6. Of course, the developers accounted for this, making Paper Mario's individual jumps less powerful, but again, enough pow beans and equipment can bump that up quite a bit. Paper Mario's hammer attack also comes with a benefit. With up to 6 paper copies, Paper Mario's hammer can attack up to 6 enemies at once. It's nice to have a basic attack that can attack multiple enemies. He even comes with his own special attacks called Trio Attacks. As the name hints, it requires all 3 party members to execute. All these characteristics of Paper Mario play into his paper attributes, characteristics and personality well. The only one thing I don't get about Paper Mario's RPG battles is that his input color is yellow! I think it would have made more sense to make his color blue. Not only because of R-G-B, but because they all blue overalls!

The one paper aspect that I don't get was the papercrafts. The papercrafts replace the Bowser battles from Bowser's Inside Story and the giant Dreamy Luigi battles from Dream Team. To some extent, I get the Bowser battles and the giant Dream Luigi battles. They show off the hardware capabilities of the 3DS: the vertical 3DS gameplay, the touch screen and the microphone. The papercrafts use none of these. The gamer holds the 3DS horizontally, not vertically. The player puts his inputs with the buttons, not with the touch screen or the microphone. Therefore, I don't understand why this is in the game. Perhaps its intention is to give the gamer a break from the RPG gameplay, but I came here to play an RPG! Maybe the developers needed a break from designing an RPG to design some other game play. Whatever the reason, I just don't understand it. This is the bad, if not the worst part of the Paper Mario series (or at least the latter part of the series)- distracting from the RPG with different gameplay.

Another gameplay mechanic that distracts from the RPG gameplay is making the papercrafts in the first place. In order to make the papercraft, Mario & Luigi & Paper Mario have to rescue Paper Toads. Sometimes rescuing Paper Toads means chasing and catching them, when other times rescuing Paper Toads means finding them hidden in an area. Sometimes the Paper Toads rescues requiring avoid enemies, and if you get attacked, you have to start from the beginning, while others have time limits. Some have both, while others have neither. Some are required to advance the game, while others are optional, but the optional have some good payoffs, like a Bros. attack. I rescued all the Paper Toads for these benefits, and I would recommend it, too.

I won't spoil the plot, but I will say it's not a McGuffin search. I can always appreciate it. The problem with McGuffin searches is that the plot ends once all the McGuffins are found. Without a McGuffin search, the plot always have the player guessing if the plot is resolving sooner than later.

I will spoil, however, the final boss. [SPOILER ALERT!] Ok, this isn't really too much of a spoiler because it's easy to guess. The final boss is Bowser and Paper Bowser. I will allow this because of the dynamic of Bowser and Paper Bowser teaming up for double the trouble. Something less expected is that, halfway through the battle, Paper Bowser turns into armor for Bowser. Again, the combination works, so I will allow it. Still, it on the easier end of boss battles. I only failed once before succeeding, and my one and only failure came during the Paper-armored Bowser, which they were kind enough to reset me to the beginning of the Paper-armor Bowser halfway point. This is a little disappointing, considering a lot of the other boss battles did take a few rounds to learn. On the other hand, the easiness of the battle made the battle feel very fair at all times [/END SPOILERS].

And with that, I have played and finished all 5 Mario & Luigi games, thus ending the Year of Mario & Luigi. Here's my ranking of the games within the series, from favorite to least favorite-

1. Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time
2. Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam
3. Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story
4. Mario & Luigi: Dream Team
5. Mario & Luigi Superstar Saga

I will still say, however, that the best Mario RPG is Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars. Good thing it's received a remake, so that future generations can enjoy it with easier access to it!

Mario & Luigi: Dream Team

Mario & Luigi: Dream Team
Developer: AlphaDream
Publisher: Nintendo
Original System: 3DS
System Played On: 3DS
Rating: 2 stars 

On August 21, 2023, I beat Antasma and defeated Dreamy Bowser, thus finishing Mario & Luigi: Dream Team for the Nintendo 3DS! In my playthrough, I leveled up Mario & Luigi both to level 37, I recovered 100% of the Pi'ilo, and I recovered 86% of the blocks. And I did it all in 43 1/3 gameplay hours spanning over about 1 3/4 months (average 1 1/2 hours per gameplay session).

What sets Mario & Luigi: Dream Team apart from the rest of the series, as the subtitle hints, is that Mario can enter Luigi's dreams. Therefore, the player plays in 2 different worlds: Pi'ilo Island and Dream World. This isn't just a change in setting, though. It's also a change in gameplay. Pi'ilo Island has Mario & Luigi exploring on a 3D plane, while Dream World has Mario & Luigi (Dreamy Luigi in the Dream World) explore on a 2D plane. This transition is so seamless that they gamer may not even tell unless they are actively paying attention to it. The change in worlds also denotes a change in battle. While exploring Pi'ilo Island, Mario & Luigi fight side-by-side, with their own attacks and stats, as with the tradition in other games in the series. When in Dream World, however, Mario and Luigi merge into one, giving Mario a stat boost, but reducing Luigi to a supporting role. Naturally you would expect this to mean 2 types of boss battles, but actually, it results in 3 types of boss encounters. Boss battles in Pi'ilo Island are just like traditional Mario & Luigi boss battles. Boss fights in Dream World can take on the same format, but they can also become giant battles, similar to the Bowser battles of Bowser's Inside Story.

Listen, I wasn't a fan of the giant battles in Bowser's Inside Story. To me, they were glorified quick time events with a little strategy thrown into them. Still, it did make a little sense to contrast big and brawly Bowser to Mario & Luigi. In Dream Team, giant boss battles make even less sense. Yes, I get they take place in Luigi's Dreams, so Luigi can make himself whatever he wants, but that leaves the question on why he doesn't make himself a giant whenever he approaches any enemy of any kind, especially ALL the boss battles (not just some). I think even the game knows this because after enough failures, the game asks if you rather just skip them. No, I did not skip them. After enough attempts of learning patterns, they make sense and can easily be learned.

Remember how, regarding Bowser's Inside Story, I complained about how it relied too much on DS features, as opposed to Partners in Time, which minimalized utilizing the DS hardware? Well, it's about to get worse with Dream Team. As the first Mario & Luigi meant for the 3DS, it wants to use all the 3DS features, including touch screen, gyroscope, and holding the 3DS vertically. This doesn't just infiltrate certain areas of the game; this molds the entire game as a whole. You'll find touchscreen controls, gyroscope and holding the 3DS vertically in exploration, puzzle solving, battles, quick time events, minigames, and the list goes on and on. It's sometimes a little jarring when the gamer constantly has to move the 3DS from vertical to horizontal, when the player has to keep taking the stylus out and putting it back in, and when the gamer has mentally switch over from controlling Mario & Luigi with the circle pad to controlling them with the gyroscope. I know developers receive more support from publisher Nintendo with the more hardware features they incorporate. Still, with this constant switching, it almost feels like AlphaDream did not know what direct they wanted to take Dream Team.

As the first Mario & Luigi game designed with the 3DS in mind, however, one positive does come from it. This is the first Mario & Luigi game that can actually be played in 3D. AlphaDream designed some pretty cool features with it, too. Previously, countering or dodging an attack from a foe came down to jumping over the attack or swinging your hammer in tandem. In Dream Team, dodging can also include moving up and down to move out of the way of the trajectory of the shot. Sometimes, countering a move requires moving up or down to line up with the shot. Furthermore, sometimes enemies will surround Mario & Luigi, and the gamer has to tell Mario & Luigi which way to look in order to counter or dodge. Sometimes, the game will add an extra enemy in the background, which the player can choose to engage with a taunt, which gives the potential of greater reward at the cost a more challenging opponent. To top things off, the 3D in this game is never too straining on the eyes. I may have only played and finish 16 3DS games, but this game is one of the better uses of 3D.

[SPOILER ALERT!] So since there is 3 types of boss battles in this game, the end game has to be all 3 boss battles in a row. The first one is a giant boss battle, the second one is traditional boss encounter but in Dream World, the third one is a traditional boss fight in a traditional Mario & Luigi fashion. Fortunately, and smart on their part, they did put save points in between the boss battles, so you can put it down if too frustrated and pick it back up later. Probably my least favorite was the giant boss battle with Bowser. It's already bad enough that I didn't get enough boss battle experiences because it's part of the tertiary gameplay loop, Bowser has got some attacks and counter never experienced in a giant boss battle before. This was the closest I was tempted to go into easy mode for any kind of boss battle. There is very little difference between the boss encounter with Antasma in Dream World and Dreamy Bowser on Pi'ilo Island. Both are allowed to bring minions in battle, both are allowed way too many attacks before Mario & Luigi can get off 1 attack, and both can way too easily heal themselves (yes, I know it's technically unfair that I brought in 40 1-Up Deluxe Mushrooms and 30 Max Mushrooms for healing, but the computer doesn't have feelings!). I will say, though, that this is the first final boss battle in a Mario & Luigi game that didn't feel like a huge difficulty spike. Yes, they still took an hour each to vanquish, but it never felt like it was because I was too weak. Heck, I think I could have done it with Mario & Luigi at level 35 or even level 30! Again, it came down to simply learning the patterns of their attack, and then either countering or dodging appropriately. [/END SPOILERS]

Just a few other things I will quickly note. I was a bit annoyed that they removed a control for both Mario & Luigi to jump at the same time. Typically, that was assigned to the Y button, but not anymore. Now the X button acts as a second A button, and the Y button acts as a second B button. I don't see why the gamer needs a second A button or B button, but I can see why the player needs a simultaneous jump button. More often, the gamer wants Mario & Luigi to jump at the same time, and less often, the player wants Mario & Luigi to jump differently. Heck, I can even see a better reason to have a simultaneous hammer button than a second A and B button. Speaking of controls, instead of the L and R buttons functioning as a sort of move wheel, with the R button rotating clockwise and L button rotating counterclockwise, the R button does indeed rotate clockwise, but the L button merely resets it back to the beginning. The former is intuitive; the latter is not intuitive. I can definitely attest to this, as halfway through my gameplay, my R button decided not to work too well. One last final minor gripe: why did they bring Starlow back? Starlow had a purpose in Bowser's Inside Story. He was the information dump, the tutorial coach and the hint guide. In Dream Team, Prince Dreambert acts as the information dump, the tutorial coach and the hint guide. So why is Starlow there then?! I can imagine some people say he's there to interact with real Luigi to change the environment in Dream World, but why couldn't Luigi just move in his sleep? One companion is enough. There is no need for 2 companions, and Starlow is the weaker companion here, so he should have went.

While I definitely like Dream Team better than Superstar Saga, I think it falls in comparison to the rest of the games in the series. It seems to fall back to the vanilla version of the series, except it utilizes the 3DS hardware to the fullest extent, perhaps even too much.

Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story + Bowser Jr.'s Journey

Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story + Bowser Jr.'s Journey
Developer: AlphaDream
Publisher: Nintendo
Original System: DS for Bowser's Inside Story, 3DS for Bowser's Inside Story + Bowser Jr.'s Journey
System Played On: 3DS
Rating: 3 stars 

On June 30, 2023, I defeated Dark Bowser and Dark Fawful (both products of the Dark Star), thus finishing Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story + Bowser Jr.'s Journey for the Nintendo 3DS. In my playthrough of the Bowser's Inside Story part, I leveled up Mario & Luigi to level 34, which is rainbow rank (the highest rank), and I leveled up Bowser to level 31, which is master boss rank (the second-highest rank). I also found 76% of the blocks, 54% of the beans, and 89% of the music. In my playthrough of the Bowser Jr.'s Journey section, I discovered 94% allies, 100% of the enemies, 66% challenges and 18% formations. I also cleared all 89 quests, thanks to getting my squad level 57. My playthrough for Bowser's Inside Story took 31 2/5 gameplay hours, and my playthrough of Bowser Jr.'s Journey took 18 1/4 hours, for a grand total of 49 2/3 gameplay hours over a 2-month span. [WARNING: SPOILERS ALERT AHEAD!]

Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story realized that 4 party members for 4 face buttons, like done for Partners in Time, was a bit too much, yet they didn't want to reduce it down to just 2 like in Superstar Saga. Therefore, the middle-ground was to have 3 playable characters. For this game, the 3rd playable character was Bowser. It only makes sense that a character as big as Bowser would take up the remainder face buttons. Yes, while Mario is the traditional A button, and Luigi is the typical B button, Bowser takes up X & Y. Bowser taking up 2 face buttons originally sounds helpful but ends up hurting. In regard to Mario and Luigi, when needing an action command, Mario is always A, and Luigi is always B. Regarding Bowser, however, when needing to do a quick time event, it could be X, or it could be Y. When you have to make quick-thinking reaction, it's easy to confuse the buttons, and that could be costly.

The 3 party members, however, do not play synchronous. Bowser plays separately from Mario and Luigi. This is the Inside Story of Bowser's Inside Story. At the beginning of the story, Fawful tricks Bowser into eating a vacuum shroom, which makes Bowser eat Mario & Luigi, as well as some Toads. Mario & Luigi spend a majority, if not most, of the game exploring Bowser's body. Bowser is the one exploring the outside world between Peach's castle and his castle. Therefore, the RPG battles will take place with either Bowser or both Mario & Luigi. Again, in regard to Mario & Luigi battles, the gamer merely has to tell which party member the attack is directed to, and then use the corresponding character's button. Regarding Bowser, however, the player has to figure which Bowser command counters the attack, which isn't always obvious. The kicker is that, in the 2nd half of the game, near the end, Mario & Luigi found a pipe in Bowser that leads to the outside world, allowing Mario & Luigi to traverse in between inside Bowser and the outside world. To quote CinemaSins, "WHAT ARE THE RULES?!" Did Bowser always have this pipe in him, or did he suck it up when sucking up everybody else? Did it always function in the sense it led to the outside world? How does it power itself? I don't get the point of this. I would have preferred the whole Mario & Luigi part of the game take inside Bowser, and leave Bowser alone the sole adventurer in the outside world. To me, the game should have ended when Mario & Luigi escaped Boswer's body.

Going back to RPG battles, Mario & Luigi have their traditional jump and hammer. Their special attacks, called Bros attacks, seem to be a combination of Superstar and Partners in Time. A lot of the attacks either come right from or are inspired by Partners in Time. The Bros attack are powered by Bros points, like in Superstar Saga, and not by items, like in Partners in Time. I like this best of both world approach. I liked the Partners in Time Bros attack better than the ones in Superstar Saga, but I like the single points system from Superstar Saga. The only problem, however, is to acquire these Bros. attacks, the gamer has to find puzzle pieces in a certain area. While well guided, they can still be missed. Bowser's regular attacks contain punching and fire-breathing, which fits Bowser. As a kind of sort of third attack, Bowser has inhale, which sucks up enemies for Mario & Luigi to deal with inside Bowser's body. I like this inclusion, as this is one of the ways to incorporate all 3 characters at the same time. Bowser has his own special attacks, known as Brawl attacks. When Bowser finds his minions in his exploration, he adds them to his party in the sense that he uses them for his special attacks. Whereas Mario & Luigi use their action buttons for their Bros attacks, Bowser uses the touch screen and stylus for his Brawl attacks. Ugh, why!?! It's somewhere between jarring and annoying that I have to take out my stylus to perform the Brawl attack, and then put it away for the rest of the battle. Half the time I just kept it out in my had while pressing the buttons.  Again, I ask why, just why. Speaking of which...

Well, way to go, everybody! Nintendo heard everybody mention how Partners in Time had so little touch screen input, so they stuffed it full of touch screen inputs for Bowser's Inside Story. In order for Mario & Luigi to activate parts of Bowser's body, it usually comes down to a minigame with touchscreen controls. The most famous (infamous) example is in the enzyme minigame for eating the carrot, but I didn't have too many struggles with it. As more touch screen minigames were added to gameplay, however, it became hard to keep track of which minigames requires which touch actions. It feels especially jarring when switching between button controls of the RPG battles and the touch screen minigames. Mario & Luigi has gone from not enough touch screen input to too much touch screen input.

Another added feature is when Bowser grows to kazu size to fight a building or a fortification. This too is based in touch screen. For these battles, the 3DS needs to be held vertical. While this is supposed to look cool, it does not feel cool. To start, the hinges of the 3DS gets in the way, unintentionally splitting a single image. On top of that, what's meant to be cool comes across as an inconvenience. The gamer has to turn the 3DS on its side when it begins, and then turn it back to normal when done. The player has to go to mashing buttons to furiously scribbling and tapping on the touchscreen. It almost feels like Alpha Dream or Nintendo had this gameplay mechanic in mind, but neither could think of a whole game of it, so they throw it into a Mario & Luigi game. This feels so out place. It does not need to be here.

Once again, Alpha Dream has a problem of escalating the final boss battle too much. On my final day of play, I did the battles between Fawful, Dark Star, Peach's Castles, and Dark Bowser/Dark Fawful. Those 4 battles alone took me 3 hours. Yes, each battle took about the same amount of time, so each battle took 45 minutes. Not only did the battle itself escalate, but the attacks within the battle escalate. One minute the enemies' attacks do 50 points of damage, and the next minute the foes' attacks do 150 damage! This makes it extremely hard to predict when to use items, and when you waste time to use items, you miss the window of opportunity to attack. I can't count the number of times that either a battle was elongated or I had to redo a battle because I miscalculated an escalated attack. Furthermore, Alpha Dream's final bosses once again gets an unfair amount of attacks. I can't count the number of turns when one of the bosses mentioned above got to use his entire arsenal of attacks before the player could even get off 1. Again, that turn is wasted if the gamer has to spend it using a healing item, only for the next turn to have the boss's whole arsenal of attacks to widdle down HP again. Once again, this feels unfair and unnecessary.

Just to briefly cover Bowser Jr.'s Journey. You'll notice Bowser Jr.'s Journey took longer than Bowser's Minion on Superstar Saga, 18 1/4 hours to 1 1/2 hours respectively. That's because Alpha Dream added more layers and gave it more depth. Bowser Jr.'s Journey adds "first mates," which gives Bowser Jr. extra leadership commands, which makes things more complicated. The 9 in your squad can form certain formations, which gives statistical advantages, as another layer of complexity. Whereas Bowser's Minions on Superstar Saga only had 1 extra challenge, a "true ending," Bowser Jr.'s Journey on Bowser's Insider Story has a whole after game, giving even more challenge. On top of that, Bowser Jr.'s Journey has a bigger and more complex story, especially considering it adds 3 brand-new antagonists. All these extra layers of complexity are good. I enjoyed them. My only complaint is that I got stuck in the middle and the end, which required grinding to advance. Still, I had to grind more often in Bowser's Minions, so Bowser Jr.'s Journey must have found a way to reduce it.

While not as exciting as the 4 party members of Partners in Time, the 3 party members of Bowser's Inside Story mixes up the formula from the 2 members of Superstar Saga. If the gamer is still wary about 3 party members, Bowser's Inside Story has the 3 party members play asynchronously, which still mixes up the formula plenty, considering both past and future games in the series. Bowser's Inside Story goes back to formatting of the Bros. Attacks from Superstar Saga, yet it keeps the style of the Bros. Items from Partners in Time, another example of the best of both worlds from the previous games in the franchise. Bowser's Inside Story utilizes the dual screens and the touch screen more than Partners in Time on the DS, for better or for worse. Bowser Jr's Journey fleshes out Bowser's Minions more, in both quality and quantity, making Bowser Jr.'s Journey worth playing more that Bowser's Minions. For all these reasons, I give Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story + Bowser Jr.'s Journey a 3-star rating out 5 stars. In comparison to the rest of the games in the Mario & Luigi series, Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story + Bowser Jr.'s Journey falls somewhere between average and mediocre. I would just play it, whether that be for an hour or until the player gets bored, but by no means feel obligated to either finish it or complete it.

Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time

Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time
Developer: AlphaDream
Publisher: Nintendo
Original System: DS
System Played On: Wii U (Virtual Console)
Rating: 5 stars

On April 30, I defeated Princess Shroob (both of them) and Bowser (although he was possessed by Princess Shroob), thus finishing Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time for the Nintendo DS (via the Wii U Virtual Console)! At the time, this was the second Mario & Luigi game I played and finished. In my playthrough, I leveled up everybody to level 30. And I did it all in a matter of 21 3/5 gameplay hours over a span of about a month and a half.

For Mario & Luigi, Partners in Time, AlphaDream must have looked at the Nintendo DS, notice it had 4 face buttons, instead of 2 like the Game Boys before the DS, and then decided to form the gameplay around that mechanic. Since Superstar Saga focused gameplay around controlling Mario with the A button and Luigi with the B button, with the DS now having 4 face buttons, 4 face buttons means 4 controllable characters. Now the gamer's party consist of Mario, Luigi, Baby Mario and Baby Luigi. Each party member is controlled by his own button. The A button controls Mario, the B button controls Luigi, the X button controls Baby Mario, and the Y button controls Baby Luigi. While this gameplay mechanic makes sense, it's more tolling on the brain that you think, especially with special moves (more on that later) and defensive maneuvers. AlphaDream must have imagine this could be a hassle, so it created ways around it. Mario & Luigi could separate from baby Mario & Luigi for battles, but then the player runs the danger of having one pair over experienced and another pair underexperienced. The other workaround AlphaDream planned was to have the babies piggy-back on the adult counterparts, in a way creating a 2-member party. While the baby and the adult join together as one, it can still easily feel like two characters. For example, the babies counter with hammers, but the adults counter with jumps, so a hammer counter requires pressing x and/or y, but a jump counter requires pressing A and/or B. Remember, the gamer is supposed to do keep the 4 buttons straight while reading cues from the animation. It's too easy to mess up which character has which button assigned (especially if the player just went from play an Xbox game to a Nintendo game!).

This especially rings true for the special moves. The special moves in this game have gone from Bros. attacks to Bros items. That is because every special attack requires a special item to use it. Now I don't mind special attacks requiring use of flower points, and I don't mind items like honey syrup to recharge the flower points to use move special attacks, but for each special attack to have its own item makes the whole gameplay more complicated than needed. True, defeated enemies do drop the special items, and shop also sell these items, making Bros items available aplenty. Just like Superstar Saga, some enemies, especially bosses, can be immune to Bros items, while other enemies, especially bosses, require Bros items to defeat them. With no advance notice, if the gamer does not come with enough of the right item, that gamer will find himself or herself screwed in battle, and after losing, will have to backtrack to find a store, or grind with the hopes of a good drop. The game is smart enough to know that more complex Bros items should do more damage, and the game does right in this aspect. Some enemies, especially bosses, feel like they need the more powerful Bros items to beat them. In order to execute these items to give aplenty damage, the player will need press the 4 face buttons in a random order without messing up once. Again, that's harder than you think. While I could see why somebody thought Bros items were a good idea, it's ultimately not.

The issue with 4 face buttons also reflects on the action moves outside battle. Going from Superstar Saga to Partners in Time, AlphaDream cut down on the action moves, which is a blessing. Partners in Time brings it down to 4 actions, an action move for each character, and, you guessed it, an action move for each button. Mario is assigned a roll, Luigi is assigned a spin jump, Baby Mario is assigned a hammer, and Baby Luigi is assigned digging. Eventually, these action moves can be combined. For example, when ball Mario & Luigi run over Baby Mario & Luigi, the babies flatten, allowing them crawl into small spaces. When spinning Mario & Luigi bump into Baby Mario & Luigi, the babies go flying to high and out of reach places. Sometimes to solve area puzzles, all 4 action moves are required at once. Again, if the gamer can't keep up with which order to press the buttons, the player will finding themselves starting all over to begin the puzzle again.

While the gameplay centers around 4 face buttons, I'm glad to say that Partners in Time is one of the few first-party Nintendo DS games that does not heavily put emphasis on the touchscreen. Only a couple or few times do I remember the game utilizing the touchscreen. For example, at one point, Mario & Luigi receive a dirty drawing, and the gamer have use the touchscreen to wipe off the paper for them. That works because it uses the touchscreen without taking the player out of the world. While I'm not against the touchscreen aspect of the DS, and there's plenty of games that use it well, the games that use it poorly are the ones forced to shoehorn it in (looking at you, Phantom Hourglass and Spirit Tracks), and I'm delighted to say that Partners in Time is not one of them. Partners in Time understands that it's OK to use the D-pad and face buttons instead of the touchscreen.

The story centers around the gamer having to recollect the shards of the Colbalt star, which shattered. At first, the player expects that this game will become the classic adventure of collecting the five pieces and then beat the big bad boss to beat the game and watch the credits roll. For the most part, it is, but it does throw a few curveballs in their to keep the gamer on his or her feet. For example, after collecting 2 colbalt star shards, Baby Bowser steals them, and a whole part of the game is dedicated to chasing Baby Bowser down to retrieve them stolen pieces. At first, these feels like padding, but after playing the game, anybody can recognize that this part of the game was to divert from the stereotypical Macguffin collection story. As another example of subverting expectations, at one point, the game gives Mario & Luigi 2 cobalt star shards. To further illustrate how this game subverts expectations, sometimes yes, the gamer has to defeat the boss, to collect the cobalt star shard, yet at other times, the cobalt star shard just sits there at the end of the area, and the boss merely stands in the way of exiting the area. These subverting the expecations and the stereotypes prevents Partners in Time from becoming a boring collect the Macguffins and defeat the final boss.

As the subtitle "Partners in Time" hints, the game plays in both the past and the present. I don't get why, though. The only place in the present the gamer goes to is Peach's Castle, and that's it. Thus, Princess Peach's castle merely acts a hub world for visiting all the areas in the past to collect cobalt star shards. This doesn't make sense to why there is a past and present. If AlphaDream really wanted Peach's Castle to merely function as a hub world, could the portals have just brought the player to different locations, not different times? If AlphaDream is going to bring time travel into Partners in Time, the gamer should have to visit a location in both the past and present, the player would have travel in the past to change things in the future. Ultimately, the only reason AlphaDream brought time travel into this is to explain how Mario & Luigi are working with their baby selves, but that could have been a once and done time travel thing.

A nice touch AlphaDream added to Partners in Time was the characterization of all the characters. Not only does Mario have a Baby Mario and Luigi has a Baby Luigi, but Bowser has a Baby Bowser and Peach has a Baby Peach. Even old Toadsworth has a young Toadsworth to interact with throughout the game. The babies reflect the adults' character too. Baby Mario quickly jumps into action to reflect how brave Mario is. Baby Luigi cries a lot reflecting the scared nature of Luigi. Baby Bowser is greedy for food, which will later reflect adult Bowser's selfish desire for the kingdom. Baby Peach always needs comforting and soothing, reflecting how adult Peach needs to always be rescued. On the flips side, the Shroobs as the bad guys of this game work well because it's an evil side of the Mushroom Kingdom, even down to Princess Shroob as a nice counter to Princess Peach.

[SPOILER ALERT!] Just like Superstar Saga, Partners in Time has a problem of escalating the difficulty of the endgame, especially the final boss. The final dungeon alone took me close to 5 hours to even get to the final boss! That's close to a quarter of my gametime! Did AlphaDream realize they did not have enough content or gameplay time by the time they reached the final dugeon, so they stretched it out and vamped up the difficulty to make up for it? Then the final boss battle technically comes in the 3 phrases. Phase 1 is the Shroob Princess that has been there all game. Phase 2 is Shroob Princess's older sister, who is also a Shroob Princess. Phase 3 is Boswer, who is possessed by a Shroob Princess (which one is hard to tell). This alone took me 2 hours! Combining the final dungeon time plus the final boss time, it took me 7 hours, which is about a third of my gameplay time! That's ridiculous. To makes thing even worse, I came prepared! Every party member was leveled up to level 30, which is the minimum most walkthroughs recommend (for the record, I only used walkthrough when I got lost on where to go next, not for help to solve puzzles or defeat enemies, but after finishing the game, I did look up recommended stats and equip items). That is because I never avoided battles and I rarely ran away from battles (losing money also discouraged me from running away in battles). All my party members wore equipment that recovered HP. I stocked up on healing items, which I almost all used up in order to defeat the final boss. Because of all this preparation, I did not get a single game over for the entire stretch of the final boss battle, although it came close. In exchange of no gameover, I got a long and drawn-out boss battle, which might be just as bad. And it's not like I had no idea how to defeat any of the phases. Sure, it took me a few times of trial and error to figure it out, but even after figuring it out, it was long. It doesn't help that the final boss gets a couple or few attacks per turn, so it's quite possible the gamer's following turn is healing up the party, which is pretty much a lost turn to doing any damage, especially if the final boss heals. To make matters worse, the Bowser phase wasn't really needed. Yes, I get the concept is to see if the player can beat a boss with just defensive maneuvers, but that one felt like just padding. Sadly, AlphaDream will never fix this final boss difficulty escalation by the end of the series. [/END SPOILERS]

Looking back, after playing just the first 2 games in the Mario & Luigi series, Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time is the more enjoyable experience. Partners in Time did a better job communicating the gameplay mechanics, making the gameplay more understandable. AlphaDream successfully mapped 4 playable characters to 4 different face buttons in a way that made sense and was not confusing, even though it sometimes would take a toll on the brain. Partners in Time does the gamer a huge favor by reducing the action moves down to 4, even though sometimes inputting the order can get confusin. Partners in Time does not fall into the temptation of having to regularly incorporate touchscreen controls, which so many DS games fall into that temptation. While Partners in Time does give into the trope of collecting the McGuffins for the plot, it at least subverts expectations enough to keep the trope fresh. Partners in Time has some of the best characterization of all characters in the entire Mario & Luigi series, if not every single game with Mario in it! My biggest, and possibly only, complaint is that for a game subtitled Partners in Time, it spends most of the time in the past, and it only uses the present as a hub world. I can understand, however, that the time travel aspect may merely exist to explain why Mario & Luigi exist with the baby counterparts simontanteously. If I had to add a second biggest complaint, it would be that Partners in Time again has the problem of escalating the difficulty of the endgame, especially the final boss, but after playing through the entire series, I see that this is a mainstay of the series, so Partners in Time should not receive extra flack for this. Therefore, for these reasons, I give Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time 5 stars. Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time is a very good game; you should play to full completion.

Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga + Bowser's Minions

Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga + Bowser's Minions
Developer: AlphaDream
Publisher: Nintendo
Original System: Game Boy Advance for Superstar Saga, 3DS for Superstar Saga + Bowser's Minions
System Played On: 3DS
Rating: 1 star




On March 11, 2023, I finished Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga + Bowser's Minions on the Nintendo 3DS, thus finishing my first Mario & Luigi game! For the record, I played both Superstar Saga and Bowser's Minions (because with the Kirby games I normally avoided the side/mini games). In regard to Superstar Saga, I beat Cackletta, leveled up both Mario & Luigi to level 36, and I also found 55% of the beans, 78% of the blocks and 88% of the music. Regarding Bowser's Minions, I beat Fawful, recruited 90% of the allies, saw 75% of the allies, learned 30% of the skills, and I did 63% of the challenges. It took me 46 hours to finish Superstar Saga, plus it took me another 1 1/2 hours to finish Bowser's Minions, equaling a grand total of 47 1/2 gameplay hours. And I did it all in a span of 2 1/3 months. Now I will review Superstar Saga and Bowser's Minions separately.

SUPERSTAR SAGA:

Nintendo has been on an ever so long quest to match or succeed the expectations set by Super Mario RPG: Legend of Seven Stars. This quest has produced both great hits and worst duds. Superstar Saga falls on the good half of the spectrum. Of course, this far exceeds Paper Mario games like Sticker Star and Color Splash, but even next to the original Paper Mario for the Nintendo 64 and The Thousand Year Door on the GameCube, Superstar Saga holds its ground. I expect nothing less AlphaDream, a video game development company made up of former Square employees. Since Super Mario RPG was a joint effort between Square and Nintendo, Superstar Saga feels more like a spiritual successor to Super Mario RPG than the original Paper Mario on the Nintendo 64 does. So many features of this game gave me nostalgic flashbacks of playing Super Mario RPG: the options of weak regular attacks or strong special attacks (they're called "Bros Attacks" in Superstar Saga), items including mushrooms to heal HP and syrups to regain Bros points, timed actions to give more damage or receive less damage, a well-balanced mix of turned-based RPG elements and platforming through a connected world (if anything, Superstar Saga feels more connected than Super Mario RPG), and minigame puzzles to solves, which were both connected to the main game and side games for bonuses. This is what I come to expect in an RPG game with Mario in it, thanks to Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars, and I found it all in Superstar Saga.

What may be Superstar Saga's greatest hits may be also its worst duds. First, let's start with the difference between regular attacks and Bros. attacks, which is the special attacks. In Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars, normal attacks all go in one menu and special attacks go in another. In Superstar Saga, while all the Bros. attacks go in 1 menu, jump attacks, hammer attacks and hand attacks (the common denominator category for Mario's fire attacks and Luigi's ice attacks), each have their own option on the battle screen. While I clearly remember the game pointing out hammer attacks upon getting the hammer, I don't recall a distinct point in which the game explained that fire/thunder can be used in battle. I didn't realize it until I saw my Bros. attacks now incorporated fire and thunder, so I figured the hand on the battle menu must be a simple fire or thunder attack. Speaking off difference between jump, hammer and hand attacks, the game really didn't do a good job of teaching these attacks had advantages and disadvantages. I knew from playing the Paper Mario series to not jump on spiny enemies or that hammers don't reach flying enemies, but the only way to learn this in Superstar Saga is to read through the in-game guides. I know the game encourages you to do so, but it does so in way that makes you feel like you're stupid for consulting the guide, and no game should do that. Make it evident in your gameplay. This gets worse with the hand attacks. Some enemies are weak to Mario's fire or Luigi's thunder. Some bosses can't even be defeated without using Mario's fire or Luigi's thunder! Does the game clearly tell you this? No. I guess I should have assumed that the boss that looks like a Christmas tree should be weak to fire, but I have played games that don't always play by those "common sense" rules (after all, in Mario's platforming games, you can shoot fireballs under water). To me, this is borderline sharing the same video game sin as Paper Mario entries Sticker Star and Color Splash committed. Unlike them, it's not as bad as requiring you to enter a battle with a specific item in mind to win. Like them, it's so bad that a game requires you to use certain attacks to defeat an enemy, especially a boss. I don't ever remember Super Mario RPG doing that to you. You just needed to widdle down the enemy's health, with either attacks or specials, and at worse, the enemy would disable one or the other. Superstar Saga takes away that freedom, and I don't like it at all.

Another shared feature between Super Mario RPG and Superstar Saga is the timed actions. Timed actions take the RPG formula up a step. No longer can gamers make a choice, set it and forget it. If the player taps the correct button when Mario's/Luigi's attack makes contact, the attack gives more damage. If the gamer taps the right button when Mario/Luigi is about to get hit, Mario/Luigi receives less damage. The only timed action not shared between Super Mario RPG and Superstar Saga is that Super Mario RPG had timed action for items. Timed actions have both advantages and disadvantages. As a disadvantage, if the gamer wants to indeed play an RPG that one can "set it and forget it" (like Pokémon), the gamer has to eliminate this game as an option. As an advantage, if the player gets just choosing commands and watching them play out, this kind of RPG keeps them busy. The problem with Superstar Saga's timed actions is that they seem to be a requirement. Forgive me if my childhood memories deceive me, but Super Mario RPG never required the gamer to use timed actions. Any enemy, including bosses, could be beaten without using timed actions. Timed actions merely gave an advantage by giving a bonus. Here in Superstar Saga, timed actions are a requirement. Some enemies, especially bosses, can one-hit KO you if you don't perform a timed action. If they don't one-hit KO you, they will two-hit KO you if you don't heal. This only gets worse as the game progresses. This is most evident playing defense, but it can also become apparently playing offense. Without timed attacks, if an opponent has a defense high enough, your attack will not damage the opponent. Even if it does land damage, quite possibly, your opponent will heal faster than you can damage. Anyone playing this game will quickly learn that the longer fights drag out, the less likely Mario & Luigi will win. Timed actions, whether attacking or defending, should not work this way. They should merely give the gamer something to do and merely give extra bonuses, not become a requirement for winning. I can't count the number of times I could only win by perfecting timed actions throughout the entire battle.

Both Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars and Superstar Saga have platforming outside the RPG battles. Superstar Saga takes the platforming up quite a few notches. On top of jumping, Mario & Luigi have to high jump, spin, crawl low to the ground, crawl underground, dash and strafe. As a positive, this movement creates interesting puzzles. As a negative, since this game originally existed on the Game Boy Advance, and since A is Mario's action button and B is Luigi's action button, the L and R buttons become a scroll bar for scrolling through these actions. Now the 3DS remake makes this more feasible by making these movements accessible on the touchscreen, but since the touchscreen also has the map, I found more feasible to keep the map on the touchscreen and scroll through the movements with the L and R buttons. Now remember that a single room or environment might require several of these movements, and on top of scrolling through them to find the right one, you may have enemies attempting to attack you. Oh, and I forgot to mention that if Mario & Luigi attack the enemy, Mario & Luigi have an advantage, but if the enemy attacks Mario & Luigi, Mario & Luigi have the disadvantage. Sometimes it makes the most sense to clear the room of enemies before trying to solve the platforming puzzle, which maybe the developers intended, but I doubt it because sometimes an opponent will just wait at the end of the platforming puzzle, and that's not the gamer's fault.

[SPOILER ALERT!] That last dungeon of Bowser's castle is just ridiculous. Some of most basic and most simple minions can one-hit or two-hit KO you. It requires the gamer to constantly go back to the last heart box to heal, which slows down any feelings of progression. Then, all of a sudden, out of nowhere, Koopalings! Each Koopaling has his own gimmick, which I felt was never introduced previously in the game. So much for the final dungeon being a test of all skills learned throughout the game. It gets worse with the later Koopalings, in which, for some reason, need to be beaten in 8 turns. Why, game, why? Do you think I'm purposely drawing out my battles? To make matters even worse, the 3DS remake for someone reason makes Mario & Luigi defeat the last Koopaling in 5 turns! This is one of the shining examples of needing to do the timed actions perfectly in order to win, as I barely won that battle with 1 turn to spare. Then the final boss battle with Cackletta is more of an endurance run. In order to do that endurance run, however, make sure you're stocked up health restoring items (I would recommend at least 10 of each), and again, make sure you practiced your timed actions to perfection. Even then, some of Cackletta's attacks really don't give any hints on how to prepare for the attacks. [/END SPOILERS]

Just in case my length rants of the negatives portray me as not liking the game, let me throw in a few more positives to prove I enjoyed the game. I do like the fact that each Mario Bros. has his own button, with Mario's action button being A and Luigi's action button being B. It adds to the feeling that the gamer is truly controlling both Mario Bros. at the same time. I can appreciate that the first Mario & Luigi game, unlike the first Paper Mario game, did not resort to making Bowser the final boss and his traditional minions the typical enemies. It was nice to have a new setting, new NPCs and new enemies, especially including a new final boss (even if Bowletta did feel like Bowser battle in disguise). I also liked that the game did not resort to a McGuffin fetch quest. Honestly, I was expecting the premise and plot of the game to fetching a certain amount of McGuffins. After all, that's what Super Mario RPG and the first Paper Mario did (ironically, both were 7 stars). While there is technically a McGuffin search, it doesn't happen until near the end of the game, and one of the main NPCs actually aids in collecting the pieces. A very pleasant surprise. Lastly, I'm glad Nintendo decided to do a graphical remake, not just an enhanced port. The Game Boy Advance has the hardware power of a Super Nintendo, but the 3DS is somewhere between the Nintendo 64 and GameCube, so it had the power to look prettier, and Nintendo utilized that. I compared screenshots, and let me tell you, I preferred the 3DS look every time. I would highly advise playing the 3DS version, even if it's free with your Switch Online subscription, especially if you want to play Bowser's Minions. Speaking of which...

BOWSER'S MINIONS:

Bowser's Minions pretty much falls under the RTS genre. The gamer picks out minions to fight in a battle against other minions, based off their stats, and then the player proceeds to watch it play out, hoping to win. Just like with Superstar Saga, Bowser's Minions does provide timed actions to prevent the gamer from getting bored waiting for the outcome. As the captain, the player has such action as denying the enemy's timed action, giving a stat boost, doing a sneak attack, calling for extra help, challenging the opposing captain head on, etc. Of course, these have costs, which the player will have to weigh out during gameplay. Even when all the captain points have been spent, the gamer can assist the NPC teammates with random action commands, assuring the player will never get bored. Some levels will have 2 or 3 battles, while other levels with have 6 or 8 battles. While teammates heal between battles on every level, if your team struggles on the first battle, your team will less likely make it all the way until the end.

Believe it or not, the grinding is fairly low. Usually, when I lost a battle, it was less likely due to under-leveled fighters and more likely due to choosing the wrong team. All I had to do was simply edit the team, and I was good to go. It wasn't until the last world that I actually had to grind to level the fighters up to a level in which they could handle the upcoming level.

This side/mini game only took me 1 1/2 hours, although I will admit that sometimes it felt longer than that. That 1 1/2 hours is just about right for this kind of game. Any longer, and I would have gotten bored, but any shorter, I would have asked myself why I played in the first place (or why the developers took their time out developing the main game for this side/mini game). Now in all honesty, I played up to the false ending. I did not get the opportunity to play the true ending. I thought the true ending required me to first beat Superstar Saga. I found that the true ending required me to fully complete Bowser's Minions up to defeating Fawful, which I did not do. This brings me to my biggest and only complaint about this side/mini game.

Bowser's Minions has optional levels called captain's challenges. In these captain's challenges, the gamer must learn to master the captain's special skill to pass. In order to make sure the player has truly mastered the captain's special skill, the game puts in place extra barriers. First, the captain goes in alone, without any minions. Second, the opponent is way over leveled. With the early captain's challenges, this is a small barrier. Simply activate the captain's special skill ability, and winner winner chicken dinner. With the later captain's challenges, however, this is a big barrier. The captain has to be a certain level, the captain's special skill needs to be activated at exactly the right time, and still even then the challenge still feels like it was coming down to luck. In my opinion, it's not worth it, and if I were you, don't waste your time on fully completing Bowser's Minions to get the true ending. Just finish it with the false ending.

NFL Predictions 2023

 Standings

AFC

East
1. Buffalo Bills
2. New York Jets
3. Miami Dolphins
4. New England Patriots

North
1. Cleveland Browns
2. Baltimore Ravens*
3. Cincinnati Bengals
4. Pittsburgh Steelers

South
1. Tennessee Titans
2. Jacksonville Jaguars*
3. Houston Texans
4. Indianapolis Colts

West
1. Kansas City Chiefs
2. Los Angeles Chargers*
3. Denver Broncos
4. Las Vegas Raiders

NFC

East
1. New York Giants
2. Philadelphia Eagles*
3. Dallas Cowboys
4. Washington Commanders

North
1. Minnesota Vikings
2. Detroit Lions*
3. Green Bay Packers
4. Chicago Bears

South
1. New Orleans Saints
2. Tampa Bay Buccaneers*
3. Carolina Panthers
4. Atlanta Falcons

West
1. Los Angeles Rams
2. Arizona Cardinals
3. Seattle Seahawks
4. San Francisco 49ers

* = wildcard

Playoffs

AFC

Wildcard
Kansas City Chiefs over Jacksonville Jaguars
Cleveland Browns over Los Angeles Chargers
Buffalo Bills over Baltimore Ravens

Divisional
Tennessee Titans over Buffalo Bills
Kansas City Chiefs over Cleveland Browns

Conference
Tennessee Titans over Kansas City Chiefs

NFC

Wildcard
Philadelphia Eagles over Minnesota Vikings
New Orleans Saints over Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Detroit Lions over New York Giants

Divisional
Los Angeles Rams over Philadelphia Eagles
New Orleans Saints over Detroit Lions

Conference
Los Angeles Rams over New Orleans Saints

SUPER BOWL LVIII:
Los Angeles Rams - 23, Tennessee Titans - 16

Why the Los Angeles Rams vs. the Tennessee Titans for Super Bowl LVIII?

Last year, coming off of the Super Bowl LVI championship, the Rams looked like they could easily repeat their Super Bowl run. They should have at least clinched a playoff birth and won a playoff game. It would not be so. Opening the season, nationally televised, against another playoff team, put too much pressure on the team too early, which resulted in a humiliating loss. It seemed like this rough start would follow the Rams throughout the season. Many star starters suffered from injuries, and those who managed to stay healthy still somehow underperformed. For example, Cooper Cupp, who earned the "triple crown" of receiving the previous season, didn't crack the top 5 in any of the categories the next season. Because of the injured players, the underperforming players, and the bad attitude players, the Rams finished 5-12, definitely not playoff worthy. Now that the Rams have fully restored to full health, and now that they have gotten rid of the bad players, from the underperforming players to bad attitude players, the Rams can easily return to Super Bowl strength and stamina. The Tennessee Titans had a similar fall from grace. TheRushy went from the 12-5 team who got the no. 1 seed in the AFC playoffs in 2021 to the 7-10 team that missed playoff qualification 2022. Probably the biggest culprit was losing AJ Brown. Without AJ Brown's receiving game, the Titans relied too heavily on Derrick Henry's rushing game, which all the Titan's opponents came prepared for, leaving the Titans little to no chance for a winning season. DeAndre Hopskins seems like a decent replacement for AJ Brown, good enough giving the Titans a good air game, which will distract from the ground game. Between this air game and this passing game, the Titans should be Super Bowl bound, breaking a 24-year Super Bowl drought for the franchise. Unfortunately, this lack of Super Bowl experience will be the team's downfall, especially in comparison to Rams, who just have a 1-year Super Bowl drought. Super Bowl LVIII will start out slow, with both teams only making it to the red zone, but not the endzone (a Super Bowl of field goals, if you will) for the first 3 quarters. The 4th quarter, however, will become a shootout of touchdowns. The Titans will get the ball back to attempt to tie the game, but they will run out time, making the Rams the Super Bowl champions. Matthew Stafford will be named the Super Bowl MVP, go to Disney World, and then announce his retirement.

NFL Honors

MVP: Patrick Mahomes (Chiefs)
Offensive Player of the Year: Josh Jacobs (Raiders)
Defensive Player of the Year: Fletcher Cox (Eagles)
Offensive Rookie of the Year: Bryce Young (Panthers)
Defensive Rookie of the Year: Will Anderson, Jr. (Texans)
Comeback Player of the Year: Damar Hamlin (Bills)
Coach of the Year: Sean McVay (Rams)

League Leaders

Passing
1. Patrick Mahomes (Chiefs)
2. Aaron Rodgers (Jets)
3. Lamar Jackson (Ravens)
4. Jalen Hurts (Eagles)
5. Josh Allen (Bills)

Rushing
1. Josh Jacobs (Raiders)
2. Jonathan Taylor
3. Derrick Henry (Titans)
4. Ezekiel Elliot (Patriots)
5. Kareem Hunt

Receiving
1. Stefon Diggs (Bills)
2. Justin Jefferson (Vikings)
3. Cooper Cupp (Rams)
4. AJ Brown (Eagles)
5. DeVonta Smith (Eagles)